Guidelines and requirements

To define the process of conducting and grading master theses, a number of documents have been prepared. These documents are intended to guide and support students, supervisors and examiners. Following the procedures described in them will ultimately result in a review used by the examiner to grade the thesis.

Description of how to write proposal for an MT project in Compting Science.

Working procedures

This paper briefly describes who does what. i.e. what the student is responsible for, and the documents to be produced by the student and a kind of chronological order when the various documents should be delivered. In addition, short of what is expected by the course coordinator, external/internal supervisor and examiner.

Proposal

The specification provided by a company many times lacks parts from the prosal we recommend. This means you should revise and extend the company specification before you hand it to the examiner/course responsible.

Planning Document

A proposal for the content of the planning document exists. Note that the follow-up planning is important. If you can not follow the plan it must be revised in concert with the external/internal supervisor.

Assessment Criteria

The basis for assessment of a student work are a number of criteria you should consider in the assessment to be made.

Supervisor (internal/external

This document will be used by external and internal supervisors. In the final stage of the thesis they make an assessment of the various elements that the student completed and send the completed document to the course manager. Please note that this completed document is an internal working paper.

Examiner

This is the examiner's final assessment of all parts of the work with regard to the comments received from external and internal supervisors.